dampscribbler: (Default)
[personal profile] dampscribbler
Earthsea fans out there will be interested in this, which is reportedly Ursula LeGuin's response to the Sci-Fi Channel "Earthsea" movie. It reads like her, so I'm inclined to believe that these are, in fact, her comments.

Date: 2004-12-16 09:57 am (UTC)
hhw: (Default)
From: [personal profile] hhw
A slightly different version was also published in Slate

http://slate.msn.com/id/2111107/

Date: 2004-12-16 10:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tamyranev.livejournal.com
That was interesting. I taped the miniseries but haven't had a chance to watch it yet. After reading that, maybe I won't bother, but will re-read the books and introduce the kids to them instead.

Date: 2004-12-16 05:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mousey1013.livejournal.com
i've never read anything by le guin except some short stories, which were lovely, but i really feel bad for her about this earthsea thing.

i think about how much creative power jk rowling has had over the harry potter films -- outright vetoing plot and scenery additions, etc. -- and i think it's a shame that all authors don't have that.

neil mentions this in his journal, along with an ain't it cool news article about the frankly abysmal sandman movie script. i realize that most author's don't have the time or the inclination to write screenplays, but why would any screenwriter in his/her right mind want to screw with the original? i'm sure these things would make more money by complying with the author's wishes... but then, i know nothing about hollywood ways.

i suppose i'd better check out these earthsea books, eh?

Profile

dampscribbler: (Default)
dampscribbler

March 2015

S M T W T F S
1234567
8910 11121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 22nd, 2026 05:20 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios