
A few weeks ago my mother sent me a link to a Wall Street Journal article. She loves the Journal, has been reading it for decades, and delights in sharing articles she thinks may be interesting or useful to others. A few days later, on the phone, she asked if I'd read it, and I said I had, but I'd found it extremely poorly written.
"Yes, I noticed that, too, the writing is really going downhill at the Journal," she said. "I've thought about sending them a letter complaining about it, but who am I?"
"Mom, you've been a Journal reader for thirty years. That gives you some authority, you can own that."
"Pssh," was her response. And the subject changed.
My mother is deeply perplexed as to why I spend time reading blogs and participating in Delphi discussions. Her ways were set in a time when authority came from above -- doctors, politicians, CEOs, editors, professors, writers...all of them carrying a sort of authority she could never approach. She might disagree with them, disregard them, even disrespect them, but the concept of her own authority never was considered. She can't really begin to comprehend the respect I have for the people I meet online, most of whom are in a socio-economic strata at or below my own, most of whom have the same level of nearly useless schooling as I. "Why would you want to read that stuff?" she says. Because the people I have found online are my peers. They're average like me, they're weird like me, they're *like me* and *not like me* at the same time. They show me ways to improve myself, they show me sides of myself I hadn't known, they reveal themselves for their own purposes, but to my benefit. They challenge me, reassure me, complain with me, hope with me. We commisserate on the state of things, celebrate the joys and sorrows of our days, and strive for a better world. We all believe that saying something, writing something, makes a difference. We all believe in our own authority, whether we're feeling particularly powerful with it or not.